Has Flowcode simplification made things harder
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 4:15 pm
Hi,
I wonder if making Flowcodes supposedly simpler approach actually made some things harder.
I am no expert on Modbus but if I use Simply Modbus Master I can put a string in and get the expected response. In Flowcode I have absolutely no idea what gives and how to see what it is actually sending and what it is receiving.
I have a Modbus temp / humidity module similar to this https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254779819352 ... qrEALw_wcB
In Simply Modbus Master I send a string 01 04 00 01 00 01 20 0B and get a response 01 04 02 01 31 79 74 which is as expected.
In Flowcode I have no idea, the device is responding as far as I am aware but no idea what it is sending.
Is there a way of sending the response buffer and for that matter the sent string to a serial port so I can see what is happening. I did find that if the exact string the device was expecting is not sent it would not respond.
Regards,
Bob
I wonder if making Flowcodes supposedly simpler approach actually made some things harder.
I am no expert on Modbus but if I use Simply Modbus Master I can put a string in and get the expected response. In Flowcode I have absolutely no idea what gives and how to see what it is actually sending and what it is receiving.
I have a Modbus temp / humidity module similar to this https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/254779819352 ... qrEALw_wcB
In Simply Modbus Master I send a string 01 04 00 01 00 01 20 0B and get a response 01 04 02 01 31 79 74 which is as expected.
In Flowcode I have no idea, the device is responding as far as I am aware but no idea what it is sending.
Is there a way of sending the response buffer and for that matter the sent string to a serial port so I can see what is happening. I did find that if the exact string the device was expecting is not sent it would not respond.
Regards,
Bob