Search found 2129 matches
- Wed Apr 22, 2026 5:16 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 250
Re: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
My linux box is running an offline AI model and it is absolutley certain beyond a shadow of doubt that MatrixTSL is a truetype font. It even has a made up github URL for me to go and visit it for where the font should be living :lol: Certainly a lot of promise with AI but at the moment you cannot tr...
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 9:57 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: FREERtos on FlowCode Library for RPi Pico
- Replies: 3
- Views: 371
Re: FREERtos on FlowCode Library for RPi Pico
Yes that should be enough to do it 
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 8:24 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: FREERtos on FlowCode Library for RPi Pico
- Replies: 3
- Views: 371
Re: FREERtos on FlowCode Library for RPi Pico
Hello, This has been done before in Flowcode but it's a bit of a hack to make it work. At the moment on the ESP32 and the Pico I beleive there is an RTOS in the background handling things like BT and WIFI but the Flowcode program runs in a single core/task. We have made it where single macros can be...
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 8:17 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Modbus TCP read error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 430
Re: Modbus TCP read error
Hello, Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. The NetworkComms1::Listen component macro call in main is not required. I'll see if I can replicate the problem with the server socket being closed as this shouldn't be happening. You could try changing the Modbus TCP component property "Open a...
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 8:08 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
- Replies: 11
- Views: 250
Re: Professional License chip packs question and continual running costs outlay
Hello, Thanks for reaching out and asking certainly a good question and good to know what you are buying. "Access to wider chip packs for diverse development needs." This statement seems to be incorrect so we will investigate and get this resolved. The best thing to look at for what the pr...
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 4:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: RPI Pico Servo-control
- Replies: 3
- Views: 189
Re: RPI Pico Servo-control
Hello,
Sorry it looks like the servo component isn't supported on Pico at the moment.
I'll try and dig in as soon as I can and see if I can implement it.
Sorry it looks like the servo component isn't supported on Pico at the moment.
I'll try and dig in as soon as I can and see if I can implement it.
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 4:17 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: String comparison esp32
- Replies: 7
- Views: 274
Re: String comparison esp32
Aha good spot thanks, not sure how that one slipped through 
Should be fully resolved now.
Should be fully resolved now.
- Tue Apr 21, 2026 9:29 am
- Forum: Projects - Embedded
- Topic: nextion display flowcode 10
- Replies: 3
- Views: 141
Re: nextion display flowcode 10
Hi I looked at your program and it looks like you're not making use of the returned value.
I think the example in the wiki is useful and should be the same way you are trying to achieve.
I think the example in the wiki is useful and should be the same way you are trying to achieve.
- Mon Apr 20, 2026 2:06 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: String comparison esp32
- Replies: 7
- Views: 274
Re: String comparison esp32
Thanks for letting us know and flagging the issue again.
I've rolled out the fix now so that v10 and v11 should now correctly return -1 instead of 255.
I've rolled out the fix now so that v10 and v11 should now correctly return -1 instead of 255.
- Mon Apr 20, 2026 11:11 am
- Forum: Projects - Embedded
- Topic: Help with string error
- Replies: 7
- Views: 210
Re: Help with string error
Hello,
I've tried to put togeter a simple test with your macro and the chip you specified, but it's compiling ok here.
You might need to attach your project so we can replicate exactly what you have.
I've tried to put togeter a simple test with your macro and the chip you specified, but it's compiling ok here.
You might need to attach your project so we can replicate exactly what you have.