I managed to solve the problem.
I copied the original flowchart to a new folder and deleted the files generated by the problematic compilation in the old folder. After that, I was able to compile normally again.
Search found 39 matches
- Mon Nov 10, 2025 10:04 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Error compiling for STM32F030K6T6 using FlowCode 11
- Replies: 3
- Views: 409
- Mon Nov 10, 2025 8:28 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Error compiling for STM32F030K6T6 using FlowCode 11
- Replies: 3
- Views: 409
Error compiling for STM32F030K6T6 using FlowCode 11
I'm trying to compile my flowchart for the STM32F030K6T6 using the new version of flowcode 11 that I purchased, but I'm getting this error. The flowchart compiles normally in version 10, but not in version 11.
What could this be?
What could this be?
- Thu Nov 06, 2025 11:30 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Error Compiling STM32 (solved)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 676
Re: Error Compiling STM32 (solved)
Hello. I also had the same problem when trying to compile my flowchart for the STM32F030K6T6, as the same warning was displayed during the compilation attempt. I edited the "STARM_CAL_String.c" file and initialized the variable in question with the value 0, and the compilation then worked ...
- Thu Sep 04, 2025 12:27 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Is it possible to use the "Flash EEPROM" component on the STM32F030F4P6?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1315
Re: Is it possible to use the "Flash EEPROM" component on the STM32F030F4P6?
Hello, Ben. All right. I appreciate your dedication. Thank you very much.
- Tue Sep 02, 2025 10:45 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Is it possible to use the "Flash EEPROM" component on the STM32F030F4P6?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1315
Is it possible to use the "Flash EEPROM" component on the STM32F030F4P6?
I hadn't noticed before that flowcode offers the option to use an emulated EEPROM. That's quite interesting. STMicroelectronics says it's possible to create an EEPROM on STM32F0 microcontrollers by applying AN4061 notes, but I'm not sure if this is possible in flowcode. The Flash EEPROM component do...
- Mon Aug 25, 2025 9:22 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
- Replies: 84
- Views: 363620
STM32C0 Microcontrollers
Are there any plans to add support for STM32C0 microcontrollers in the future?
If not, I would like to know if you are working on any other model.
If not, I would like to know if you are working on any other model.
- Mon Aug 11, 2025 10:55 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Burn code to ESP32-WROOM-32 Module using ESP32 FLASH DOWNLOAD TOOL software
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2378
Burn code to ESP32-WROOM-32 Module using ESP32 FLASH DOWNLOAD TOOL software
Hello. I created a flowchart for the ESP32-WROOM-32 module using FlowCode. I need to send the file to someone who doesn't have FlowCode so they can flash an ESP32 module. I tried using the 'ESP32 FLASH DOWNLOAD TOOL' software to write the .bin file to memory, but after burning, the code doesn't run ...
- Fri Aug 08, 2025 5:30 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Thermistor temperature reading issue after FlowCode component update
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2349
Re: Thermistor temperature reading issue after FlowCode component update
Hello. Has the problem with the thermistor component been verified?
- Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:55 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Thermistor temperature reading issue after FlowCode component update
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2349
Re: Thermistor temperature reading issue after FlowCode component update
I followed these steps. I used the previous version of the thermistor. Now it's working again.
I didn't know about this tip. It really helped me a lot.
I'm very grateful for your help. I'm very satisfied. Thank you very much!
I didn't know about this tip. It really helped me a lot.
I'm very grateful for your help. I'm very satisfied. Thank you very much!
- Fri Aug 01, 2025 9:38 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Thermistor temperature reading issue after FlowCode component update
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2349
Re: Thermistor temperature reading issue after FlowCode component update
I remember seeing a post a while back where you explained the calculations for this beta version. Thank you for your great contribution, Martin.