Flowcode is much easier to work with
Search found 1853 matches
- Tue Jun 23, 2026 7:34 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: convert C code to Flowcode
- Replies: 5
- Views: 965
Re: convert C code to Flowcode
Why thank you kind sir...
Flowcode is much easier to work with
Flowcode is much easier to work with
- Mon Jun 22, 2026 3:03 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: convert C code to Flowcode
- Replies: 5
- Views: 965
Re: convert C code to Flowcode
Something like:
Martin
Martin
- Sat Jun 20, 2026 11:08 am
- Forum: User Components
- Topic: MAX7219 32x32 LED Display
- Replies: 63
- Views: 12885
Re: MAX7219 32x32 LED Display
"blank display" - 'space'
Yes - a good way of reducing memory usage - I'm not sure if the component still has the 16x16 characters but you could strip those out if you don't use them.
Yes - a good way of reducing memory usage - I'm not sure if the component still has the 16x16 characters but you could strip those out if you don't use them.
- Fri Jun 19, 2026 7:41 pm
- Forum: User Components
- Topic: MAX7219 32x32 LED Display
- Replies: 63
- Views: 12885
Re: MAX7219 32x32 LED Display
Looking good....
- Wed Jun 17, 2026 3:50 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Using FVR on a adc channel
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2187
Re: Using FVR on a adc channel
Something like might do the trick - I hadn't realised the check was done for so many different ADCC types - and I'd just used the first :-( So, for my case, adding the code to the PIC16F188xx code does seem to make a difference. Still not returning the right value - but at least it's not 1023 any mo...
- Wed Jun 17, 2026 2:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Using FVR on a adc channel
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2187
Re: Using FVR on a adc channel
In my experiment - the potentiometer component always seems to return VRef (so 4.096V) - hence my play above. Looking at the CAL code - there is some to handle FVR mode and I tried modding this to be more like my setup code above (which does return the correct result) - it doesn't set all the FVR re...
- Tue Jun 16, 2026 1:18 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Using FVR on a adc channel
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2187
Re: Using FVR on a adc channel
Hi Bob, I did everything myself - as using the component wasn't giving the expected result. I wanted to check that the hardware was playing nicely. It should be possible to use the component - with the extra FVR setup (although i didn't have time to check this morning) but if the component sets thes...
- Tue Jun 16, 2026 7:19 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Using FVR on a adc channel
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2187
Re: Using FVR on a adc channel
I got something working - so at least the hardware is good? My first test - I used the potentiometer component - and didn't get the result I was expecting :-( I'd connected 3v3 from an Arduino to rd1 as a simple test value (and of course connected the ground pins) I connected the UART Tx to a logic ...
- Mon Jun 15, 2026 11:02 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Using FVR on a adc channel
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2187
Re: Using FVR on a adc channel
Hi Bob, Silly question - but have you just tried reading a voltage using the FVR settings? Would be a good test that things are actually working - and then handle the voltage divider resistors when the ADC is working correctly? I've wired up a 16f18877 which seems to support this using identical cod...
- Fri Jun 12, 2026 2:56 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Adjusting the quad 7-segment display to work with the BDP650A (advice)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 504
Re: Adjusting the quad 7-segment display to work with the BDP650A (advice)
It's not quite i2c but it should be quite easy to get something up and running.
Using one of the existing 7seg drivers should just require a change to the communications where used - so either start from the tm1637 or a max7219 base.
Martin
Using one of the existing 7seg drivers should just require a change to the communications where used - so either start from the tm1637 or a max7219 base.
Martin