Search found 84 matches
- Wed Mar 12, 2025 9:26 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: PIC18F15Q41
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4339
Re: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
Hello Martin, yes, but there are 2 error messages. I have used the uart as midiinterface. Is that a problem? ::: error: (1504) the PIC18 extended instruction set was enabled but is not supported by this compiler (908) exit status = 1 Error returned from [xc8.exe] And, I can't compile without midi co...
- Mon Mar 10, 2025 5:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PIC18F15Q41
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4339
PIC18F15Q41
Hello Martin, hello Ben,
anny news about the PIC18F04/05/06/14/15/16Q41 family?
As as already written, it is very urgent for some of my company's
products!
thanks
Dirk
anny news about the PIC18F04/05/06/14/15/16Q41 family?
As as already written, it is very urgent for some of my company's
products!
thanks
Dirk
- Wed Dec 11, 2024 4:02 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
- Replies: 69
- Views: 222437
Re: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
Hello Martin,
very good. What I urgently need are the components UART, I2C and PWM.
Thank you very much
Dirk
very good. What I urgently need are the components UART, I2C and PWM.
Thank you very much
Dirk
- Mon Dec 09, 2024 2:16 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PIC18F15Q41
- Replies: 5
- Views: 417
Re: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
Hello Martin, the uart-component too C:\ProgramData\MatrixTSL\FlowcodeV10\CAL\PIC\PIC_CAL_UART.c:541:1: error: (192) undefined identifier "RX1PPS" C:\ProgramData\MatrixTSL\FlowcodeV10\CAL\PIC\PIC_CAL_UART.c:585:17: error: (255) not a member of the struct/union "" C:\ProgramData\M...
- Mon Dec 09, 2024 1:19 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PIC18F15Q41
- Replies: 5
- Views: 417
Re: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
Hello Martin, unfortunately there is an error message because of the I2C. C:\ProgramData\MatrixTSL\FlowcodeV10\CAL\PIC\PIC_CAL_I2C.c:127:100: error: (103) #error: "I2C does not have the SSPIF defined on this chip - does your chip support this feature?" I have ported my project from the PIC...
- Mon Dec 09, 2024 12:23 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: PIC18F15Q41
- Replies: 5
- Views: 417
Re: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
Hello Martin,
many thanks for that. Is the component for one chip or for the complete
PIC18F04/05/06/14/15/16/Q41 family family? If so, how do you set this?
Regards
Dirk
many thanks for that. Is the component for one chip or for the complete
PIC18F04/05/06/14/15/16/Q41 family family? If so, how do you set this?
Regards
Dirk
- Mon Nov 18, 2024 12:07 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Component Digi-Pot MCP45HVX1
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9249
Re: Component Digi-Pot MCP45HVX1
Hello Martin,
I am very happy. The component now works as it should.
By the way, any news about the PIC18F06/16Q41 / PIC18-Q41 Family?
Many thanks
Dirk
I am very happy. The component now works as it should.
By the way, any news about the PIC18F06/16Q41 / PIC18-Q41 Family?
Many thanks
Dirk
- Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:01 am
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Component Digi-Pot MCP45HVX1
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9249
Re: Component Digi-Pot MCP45HVX1
It must be address 38, as the original MCP45XX MCP46XX component has 1 more variable address, bit 3 with the value 4. 0x38 + 4 = 0x3C. I therefore always had to set address bit 3. Then the addressing was correct. Of course it was just a workaround and worked well. Now it is as it should be! Many tha...
- Mon Nov 11, 2024 6:14 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Component Digi-Pot MCP45HVX1
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9249
Re: Component Digi-Pot MCP45HVX1
Hello, I have edited the original MCP45XX and saved it as MCP45HVX1. Only the address of the initialisation had to be changed. However, I have to delete the original component, otherwise it won't work. What do I have to enter so that I have two components? Also, there must be 257 steps, not 256 step...
- Mon Nov 11, 2024 5:18 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
- Replies: 69
- Views: 222437
Re: Suggestions for new microcontroller support
Hi Martin
thanks
thanks